|
|
SOME ISSUES OF THE IMPROVEMENT OF STATE SUPPORT OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
Год: 2013
Издательство: IZVESTIA OF TIMIRYAZEV AGRICULTURAL ACADEMY (IZVESTIATSKHA). SPECIAL ISSUE. 2013. - PUBLISHING HOUSE OF RSAU-MTAA. MOSCOW. P. 20 - 30.
Автор(ы): GATAULIN А M. GATAULINA E.A.
Ключевые слова: state support of agriculture, interest rate subsidy, lump sum payments, State pro- gram of agricultural development
PDF-файл: http://www.viapi.ru/download/2013/126820.pdf
The paper is focused on the analyses of the implementation of the interest rate subsides for the loans received by agricultural producers and processors. Problems associated with the large-scale use of this subsidy are highlighted and changes proposed by the government to solve these problems are analyzed. It is concluded that resulting problems are being solved by the State however not to the full extent as long-term obligations of the state remain unchanged. It is proposed to substitute the interest rate subsidy for investment loans by lump sum payments of the 30% of the principal debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology, risk and technical efficiency in agriculture: evidence from Tatarstan
Год: 2012
Издательство: Труды XII Международной научной конференции по проблемам развития экономики и общества (в 4-х томах) кн. 4.
Автор(ы): H. Hockmann / E. Gataulina
Ключевые слова: Risk production function, internal and external transaction costs
The paper investigates the significance of external and internal transaction costs and risk in agricultural in the Oblast Tartarstan. The analysis is conducted for independent farms and farms which are member of an agroholding. The result provide indication that external transaction costs are more pronounced in independent farms than in agroholding members. However, average prices do not differ among the organisational forms. With regard to internal transaction costs (or inefficiency) the result is revered. Inefficiency in agroholding members is considerably higher than in independent farms. However, the estimation suggests that this result is due to more intense risk management in agroholding members. Thus, members of a business group have a more intense inputs use, however, these are rather allocated to reduce uncertainty of production than to increase production.
|
|
|
|
|